Average Price Of Toe Shortening My

Al Qaeda and the currents of "fundamentalist" Islamic


















Facts and Myths

"East has been almost a European invention ... "[..]
presupposed an unchanging Orient, absolutely different from the West (the reasons for this change from one era to another) ...
"[...] The East 'orientalist', "could have been created by another relationship that was not the policy of master-slave relationship?"
(Edward W. Said, "Orientalism")

A constant of all imperialist domination has been the creation stereotypes about the oppressed, to justify their subjugation. From the Roman Empire barbaricus was a duty to enslave, "to the dangerous" Islamic "(with the pump in the pocket) waving U.S. imperialism and its junior partners in Europe. All these scarecrows have been created by that "the political master-slave relationship, which indicated the great Palestinian intellectual Edward W. Saïd (1935-2003).

After the end of the Cold War, the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989/91, "Islamophobia" was replacing anti-communism in the media circus and ideological West. And it came to height with the bombing of the Twin Towers in 2001, which gave the desired pretext for the U.S. to launch neo-colonial wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Thus, imperialism was spent to renovate an old stereotypes about the Orient "Islamic" essentially unchanged, frozen in the "religious fanaticism" and incapable for centuries, almost genetically, "progress" and "civilized." In addition to the versions offered by illiterate Yankees series and movies, these racist myths also disseminated to more public religious movements, for example, the hodgepodge of Huntington about the "clash of civilizations." [1]

Al-Qaeda and the currents of "fundamentalist" Islamic have been just perfect for the masters of the West to put the myths of "Islamophobia" in the forefront of popular sectors in the U.S. and Europe, especially among the middle classes going from bad to worse with the capitalist crisis and need a bogeyman to fear and hate.

The paradox of this is that it was imperialism, particularly the U.S., who was instrumental in the emergence of "political Islam"-and especially of "Islamic fundamentalism" - in the last decades of the twentieth century.

A course of two centuries toward modernization and secularization that was interrupted

Indeed, the so-called "Muslim world" (in which the Arabs have an important but minority), far from being immutable ideologically and politically, followed in the past two centuries a marked course toward modernization, secularization and secularism. This trend was interrupted in the late twentieth century, especially in the '80s and '90s, the strengthening of current policies that are demanded of Islam, with more or less extreme positions. In a small minority in relation to secular nationalism and even to the left, came to have mass influence in some cases.

should be noted, first Instead, the emergence or strengthening of religious fundamentalism in those years is not exclusive to the Muslim world. It was a global phenomenon.

Simultaneously, India exploded Hindu and Sikh fundamentalism. In the U.S., a component of the "Conservative Revolution" Reagan was the epidemic of Christian fundamentalism with more reactionary sects and preachers, televangelists unbearable. This global phenomenon

political-religious ideology was part of a reactionary stage, with widespread losses in the labor movement and mass, culminating in the collapse of the former USSR, the capitalist restoration in the (alleged) socialist countries and neoliberalism reigns everywhere.

Losses, ideological and political vacuum, and action of imperialism

to the emergence of "political Islam" in general and of Islamic fundamentalism in particular, have combined a variety of factors, some common to those who pointed and specific. The main ones were:

• Bankruptcy and disasters of radical secular nationalism, which also called themselves "socialist", whose ultimate expression was the Nasser regime in Egypt. Secular nationalism were, in turn, an overwhelming mass support. Also, initially tried promote economic development and gave an independent reaching concessions to the workers and popular masses. This support was losing the rhythm of economic failure, corruption of the state apparatus and relapse in the misery of mass sectors.

• The left parties but also developed strong in Egypt, Iraq, Syria and other countries, never struggled to be an alternative to the inevitable disaster of secular bourgeois nationalism. Hegemony of the communist parties obedient to Moscow, he applied the line for the "progressives" of the bourgeoisie that dictated the Kremlin. In 1979, the military occupation of Afghanistan by Soviet Union was added as a factor of political turmoil and immense prestige of socialism versus the masses.

• Amid the growing political and ideological vacuum, Islam traded with the decisive support of the U.S. through its main agent in the region after Israel, the billionaire oil monarchy of Saudi Arabia. Since the mid-'50s, after failing in their attempts to attract Nasser, USA defined as the axis of its policy to promote Islamist currents against secular nationalism and the left.

The "political Islam" ... in part, Made in USA

The "revival" "political Islam" was not of course a graft from another planet. But, in its complexity, must be aware that anything had a strong "Islamic" means the direct or indirect action of U.S. imperialism. [2]

This covered many areas. For example, while the secular nationalist governments were increasingly unable to meet the needs of the masses, from the oil states will finance a billion dollar network of "charities" operating from Islamic mosques. It came to the most deprived masses and less political and cultural level.

Another item-is facing the middle class and bourgeois sectors was set up networks of "Islamic banking" (which supposedly does not charge interest, forbidden by the Koran). Large U.S. banks, such as City and Chase gave operational support. These "Islamic financial sectors" were preachers of neoliberalism and privatization ... preaching that had audience with the failures of statist nationalism.

The war in Afghanistan

But the leap was the jihad (holy war) against the Soviet occupation in 1979. There is "born" Osama bin Laden and passed to the most extreme face of "political Islam."

From the works of Charity of the mosques and loans of the "Islamic banks", was passed to organize the first international Islamic army in history, thousands of fighters who came from Morocco to Malaysia, speaking dozens of languages. Osama is laid by the CIA at the head of recruitment and organization of the force.

His appointment was no accident. As a person, Osama reflected the close association that existed between the "fundamentalism", the Saudi state and Washington. The bin Laden is one of the richest families in Saudi Arabia, closely linked to the monarchy as a works concessionaire. Moreover, as partners Bush family since the '60s were in close relationship with the American establishment.

After the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in 1989, the mujahedin gathered by Osama dispersed in various countries, where many continued to operate, but now beyond the control of imperialism that had armed and trained.

Meanwhile, the collapse of the former USSR had also changed the game of Washington and the governments of Muslim states in relation to these increasingly angry "holy warriors." Terrorist actions in Afghanistan were doing before, now began to make in other countries. In the '90s, it was growing. September 2001 it was just the peak of this climb.


-----------------------------------------------

--------------------------------- Notes: 1 .-


Huntington, Samuel P. " The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1996. English edition of Paidós there.


2 .- This was, of course, contradictory elements: Iran, a predominantly Shia, a minority branch of Islam, developed a strong political movement that played a key role in the overthrow of the Shah's pro-US regime in 1979 and since then has had more friction or less strong with the U.S.. But at the same time, after the 1979 revolution, the clerical unit ended up playing a role arch-reactionary, crushing the labor movement and the Iranian left.


By Claudio Testa

Rollercoaster Drop Feelings

shed no tears for bin Laden, but ... We condemn the state terrorism of U.S. imperialism!



















On Sunday May 1, in an unexpected news conference, Obama announced the death, or more appropriately, the murder of Osama bin Laden.

Reports and confusing and contradictory accounts of the U.S. government, the fact that refuses to show a single photograph of the deceased and also say you can not produce the body of bin Laden because he has thrown into the sea, has fueled all sorts of doubts and speculations. Is not there any independent observer or witness who can corroborate any of these statements by Obama and his staff.

However, it is likely that, indeed, the command of assassins sent by the White House Abbottabad, Pakistan, death to give Osama bin Laden. Even his supporters in the region seem to take that for true.

detained for trial, though it was a parody, could become a boomerang for imperialism directly or indirectly responsible death of millions of human beings in the "greater Middle East" from that in 1991 Bush (father) launched the first war in Iraq and in the decade following his son began colonial occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.

worse, Osama bin Laden was a "wayward child" of the CIA. Blood career did not begin in September 2001 with the attack on the Twin Towers in New York, but as a coordinator, appointed by the CIA and Saudi Arabia, the Islamic jihadists who came from many countries to "fight Communism" in Afghanistan during the '80s. At that time, for the U.S., bin Laden and his people were not "terrorists" but "Freedom fighters", "freedom fighters" praised in Hollywood films.

would have been, therefore, very interesting to hear bin Laden on trial! That must have reasoned that the gangsters in the White House wisely remember that "the dead do not speak."

State terrorism of global policeman Sean

as are the percentages of reality and fable of the information on the operation of Abbottabad, there is a central point, infinitely more important.

The point is that imperialism itself the right to kill who he wants anywhere in the world. The United States has carte blanche to a group of assassins sent to another country to kill whoever the government wants.

Even from the standpoint of bourgeois international law, which Obama has committed a crime simply, is a politically motivated murder, also committed by the military power of the American state. Put another way: it is terrorism pure and simple state.

For this reason, the fakers of the UN in the first moments were silent and confused ... before disposing in congratulations to Obama and kiss the NWMA that feeds them. Is that all the talk about "international law" and the "international community" came down against this brutal fact.

With this action, U.S. tries to defend his title of world policeman ... but with an aggravating factor. In states bourgeois "democratic" and "normal" is not legal to gendarmes and police officers who want to kill. U.S., by contrast, not only self-proclaimed world policeman, judge and executioner but is not accountable to anyone!

So no "justice was done" as proclaimed by Obama. No "justice was done", even in terms of bourgeois-democratic legality!

Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the nature of the "fundamentalist" Islamic

Gravity as involved in these murders (both of the alleged "leader of Al Qaeda" and those who were at his home) has become dangerously confused about the nature of a character like bin Laden, political and humanly untenable.

The "fundamentalist" Islam in general and bin Laden were not particularly progressive currents, even though they had finally clashes with imperialism. Bin Laden path that largely embodies.

His career began in the 80 military service of U.S. imperialism and one of the most reactionary regimes in the world: Saudi Arabia. At that time, Washington's policy was to support the "Islamist" especially those who would go to Afghanistan. There bin Laden "created" Al Qaeda. Initially there was an "organization", but the database made by bin Laden for the CIA, the Islamists were going to fight there.

But the break with the U.S. and then the terrorist attack of September 2001 did bin Laden's most progressive and current. So, on that occasion, who constitute the current years after Socialism or Barbarism, we demonstrate "totally against these terrorist actions"

"First, the vast majority of victims are employees and American workers, the you can not simply identify the bourgeoisie and its imperialist state. Nothing human is alien to us. And from a human standpoint, we sympathize with them and their families, while we emphasize the responsibility that imperialism has in this tragedy. With these methods are not going to destroy capitalism and imperialist oppression, let alone go down that road towards a more just society, socialism.

"Secondly, these actions, more 'spectacular' that they are not undermine the real power of the enemy. By contrast, the momentary havoc that can result in their ranks, it's nothing compared to the confusion produced in the field of workers and peoples. Thus, an important sector of the American people are asking for a 'military response', ie back to be cannon fodder of the U.S. bourgeoisie as in Vietnam. Before the attack was, however, strong opposition to military adventures abroad.

"[...] As one of the disastrous consequences of the attacks, Bush, along with other imperialist leaders like Tony Blair, is using to structure a front counter and repressive national and global scale. "(Declaration of MAS , September 2001)

And unfortunately, it was! Without the convenient September 2011 attacks, imperialism would have been impossible to undo the colonial wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and push in the U.S. (and Europe) a wave of "Islamophobia", very useful to blind workers and popular masses in these countries about who their real enemies.

The attacks of September 11 strengthened imperialism, especially U.S.. For several years served to legitimize in the eyes of the masses, especially in the imperialist countries, the most aberrant colonial wars and supporting pro-Western dictators and autocrats in the region, as well as the genocide of the Palestinian people by Israel.

The rebellion of the Arab world and the political death of bin Laden

The physical disappearance of bin Laden comes at a time of decline of the Islamic fundamentalist currents, at least among the Arab peoples. It is no coincidence that these currents, including Al Qaeda, now only have weight in non-Arab regions (such as Afghanistan and parts of Pakistan). Bin Laden had been politically buried by the wave of uprisings in the Arab world.

is the opposite of what happened in the last decades of the last century when it developed strong Islamic fundamentalist currents. The great rebellion of the Arab peoples has shown, however, the emergence lay broad sectors, "secular". In any country where they have broken up fights and rebellions, religion and / or sectarian disputes have been a demarcation line!

Simultaneously, the current "political Islam" have been in the back of these events. This was true both for moderate currents, like the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, to the fundamentalists and very weak. They have played a role or leading in any of the riots and protests.

Also, the process that has broken out, directly threatening the religious and Antila states in the region: Saudi Arabia and Iran. Although the latter is not an Arab country, the "shock wave" of the earthquake also affected.

Obama stands a short-term victory but the trend does not change deep crisis and decline of U.S. imperialism

Organized as a show of election campaign, Obama is doing on stage the role of big winner, with an eye on reelection. More broadly, it attempts to present as a major strategic victory for U.S. imperialism in the vague and unending "war on terrorism."

However, after being off the spotlights and the show ends, the balance is much less great. Obama and U.S. imperialism have gained a victory, but temporary and of limited scope. This is based, again, in the almost unique factor that the U.S. continues to maintain a decisive advantage: its military power.

But none of this trend reverses deep crisis and economic decline, social and geopolitical imperialism. Even in strictly military level, there might be a serious problem. Many Americans to question: "if you won the war against terrorism, we are doing in Afghanistan and Iraq?"

Meanwhile, in the U.S., drunkenness "patriotic" is that unemployment compensation does not yield, and an entire generation is doomed to the "austerity" budget cuts, low wages and job insecurity ... while 1% of billionaires have become super-profits ... and pay fewer taxes ...

Globally, it will not reverse the trend to "indiscipline" on U.S. imperialism, which is setting up an increasingly chaotic world. Neither the masses in rebellion "greater Middle East", but not prime them Islamic fundamentalism will become devotees of Washington.

All this, of course, not to underestimate the power that still has this imperialism. Is in decline but not on the verge of collapse.

"American capitalism wants to establish an imperial autocracy all over our planet," warned Trotsky in 1924, when the U.S. was just beginning its ascent. Today, despite its decline, this claim still stands!

to support this claim is "an imperialist autocracy our planet" that is behind the criminal incursion Abbottabad, Pakistan, and not concern for the victims of 11 September. It is from this perspective that we define ourselves, repudiating.

repudiate state terrorism of U.S. imperialism!

Outside the world's policeman! Current

International Socialism or Barbarism
May 7, 2011

Golds Gym Xr5 Dimensions

May 1, the COB calls Grand National March

Pretty Woman Polka Dot Dress Brown

a dress rehearsal. DOES THE WORKING CLASS EXPERIENCE IN THE GENERAL STRIKE BY






















"If This is change, change is a m. .. ".

Thus began the first days of April, with people on the street and with a degree of dissatisfaction was seen in the faces of the working class mobilized. The facts were developed gradually with the passing days and the government decided to problems worker population, an issue that has been questioned since the days against gasolinazo December.
So, more and more departments were added to the struggles. But there were twists and turns that will be explained below regarding how they ended up giving the facts.
In short, what is gained is a miserable 10 plus 1% wage increase, far behind what the fight left raised as a possibility.

The main control measure employed in years

At this point we stop to explain the scope and limits has been a general strike. The first thing we say is that was the biggest strike that has taken to suffer the government since the inauguration of Evo Morales. If I fail to be truly "general", however not without its enormous importance we dare say.
The fact is that joined tens of thousands of workers, the measure was truly national in scope, with the epicenter in La Paz, where marches were held for more than ten consecutive days. But the most remarkable of all was that for the first time in many years in the heart of the fight again to be important sectors of the working class wage.
mobilized workers were miners, workers, teachers, faculty and staff of universities and, finally, stockholders. Those
were most prevalent were the teachers on both the rural and urban components. Clarify that rural teachers was one of the most important arms of government support among the employees in previous years. But today, the unrest has reached that these workers have enough experience with this government to understand that it is not a government of workers.

The COB provides a strike that was for more

But we also see the limitations that had the first real test of a general strike under the MAS government.
One was given by the fact that the miners were fighting for the wage increase, well stated by the executive la federación de mineros que ellos "no estaban por el salario".... Por esto no hubo la paralización de actividades en las minas; y no estuvo planteada la consigna de nacionalización de la minería privada, porque muchos compañeros en un grado atrasado de la conciencia, siguen defendiendo como fuente de trabajo a la minería privada.
Esta fue una de las causas por la que la huelga no haya sido más intensa y con mayor presencia minera en la ciudad. Y de esto se agarro el gobierno para decir que "la producción no estaba paralizada". Algo parecido paso entre los fabriles, pero con otro signo: la precariedad del trabajo hacia peligrar fuentes de trabajo si se paraba algunas fabricas. Sin embargo, la razón fundamental de que factory workers have not been mobilized forcefully as last year lies in the bureaucratic leaders and not elsewhere.
From this it becomes the responsibility of the current leadership of the COB at the head of Pedro Montes. Because the reality is that it came very discredited after the betrayal of last year when left isolated factory workers and teachers. In this part many of the whys no progress was made in the fight. The betrayals are paid someday.
That's where the COB to negotiate and carry out and, again, to sell a strike that was on the rise and the whole society polarized by two cents. Because the strike had everything to gain from having open a clear political crisis in the government, which again seemed to lose control of events ", especially when the strike had no signs of wear and more unions are prepared to enter on Monday before the talks.

The old trick of accusing reformist workers in struggle as "agents" of the right

Another mistake was to have left the strike and can not guarantee that the government did not retaliate. The output should end the conflict by imposing the government not to take revenge, dismissals or discounts to employees. But the leadership of the COB does not guarantee even that which is fundamental to keep intact the fighting forces, and more so when those forces seem to be growing.
In the words of Vice President García Linera tired to discredit the movement, rather than slander, making provocative statements, "the matter said:" They deserve trial comrade leaders deserve trial (...) his attitude is criminal, rather serum to the patient, dynamite to scare children (sic) We have to outrage! ". This will have to explain to the Vice President that children are frightened of the dynamite ... but suffering from hunger, now more than two million children go hungry. Here is the limit of the government's lies: the hungry children comes first where malnutrition is presented to catastrophic levels.
why some departmental labor unions rejected what he said the central Bolivia. And if the government continues on the path of such statements, as a means to intimidate workers and cope with other social, things could become radicalized, with the government and the union bureaucracy: Do not forget that the workshop remains strong the end of December against gasolinazo.
One of the things that came to light, is that the government "as he had done in the conflicts of last year, accuses any sector worker who" pulls up to the plate "to be" agent of imperialism. " We insist: these are provocations seeking to isolate those who struggle the rest of society, but could have the opposite effect to that intended by the ruling party leading to extreme social polarization have not been given so far.
As you said Deputy Coordination with social movements, César Navarro, noting that the COB answer to "sectors of the ultra right that have infiltrated" a total lie only in the service of the unconditional defense of a government, Ultimately, more capitalist "reform" the proclamation.
With these arguments, they end up saying that anyone who attacks the government "communitarian socialism" (socialist who has nothing, and community, really, either) is right ...

COB Why was not until the end?

COB From the beginning, wanted to close the dispute as to give him a crumb of bread. The point is that the direction was highly questionable from the beginning.
At first, it was the first meeting with the government, the COB was half the idea of \u200b\u200blifting, but the bases were those imposed upon him to continue the strike.
But the key point is that the COB that this strike boost adoption increases at the levels needed to win the conflict and twist the arm of the government. What was done by the State was giving a paltry increase to get rid of the demonstrations. And that's made it look as COB a great "victory", the same leftist organizations such as the POR, which initially rejected the negligible increase, then raised it was "most desirable" ...
The truth is that the COB work this conflict with a view to the next Congress, today postponed until further notice.
This situation raises the need to build revolutionary addresses do not exist today. The task of incorporating new unions in the fight were not taken seriously. The Inter only stays in the margins that always was and never left where found. To win these conflicts, it should be large agencies to incorporate the majority of workers. CEDLA just released a report saying that 60% of the population receives a salary, refuting the vile lies of the government that we only reduced by 15% to the working population.
In conclusion, the negotiation is 11% away from the core that is fighting for better living conditions. This is wrong in the COB to raise their hands and determine "intermission" that is understandable when the people were for much more, or is understood that, ultimately, Montes y cia do nothing to end the game making MAS ruling.

To win the struggle is necessary to build a political instrument.

While these events happen, it is increasingly necessary body from political workers and for workers. This body would have to go against all union pressures being experienced in the conflict, leaving aside the pettiness and the prestige of one sector or another, and form the broadest possible unity with workers and peasants to fight for a perspective laying the foundations for an alternative to the lies of the MAS and its supporters.
This organization has to have the horizon to form the revolutionary leadership that is lacking today in the labor movement. A comparison of PER, which only sees the issue as political union, unions engaged in fights, the new organization has to put up a fight at a political level extended to all unions that already have experience with government and see no way out in the draft "change" silver by Morales and Linera.
Then, the project is to form a body that labor unions and transferred him from a political perspective revolutionary struggle of the labor movement, settling at once as an alternative to direct the struggle itself.

Replacement Truck Tool Box Lock

The politics of Labor "or revolutionary politics? Call












After the general strike and the strike itself were the policies of the groups that make up the revolutionary left in the country. They were almost all groups (or small groups) these days but political differences and are evaluating what happened.
were those who said that "the strike lasted longer than expected" to those who, seeing a silver lining to the negotiations, agreed, saying that 1% was not enough, but "as he accepted the COB, respond so they decided to ". In the latter organization
we stop to make a purely political analysis of their union: it is the Revolutionary Workers Party (POR).

unrealistic approaches do not work to fight

Since long time ago, this organization suggests that you have to fight for the minimum wage or a salary commensurate to the basket that round today in the 8300 Bolivian.
No pregnant, fight for a qualitative increase workers' wages can not be to throw words to the wind pose unattainable goals under the present conditions, only after agreeing to end ridiculous figures to the unreality of the initial pose.
Because that's what happened: The tail-BY him the address of the COB that I start demanding an increase from the current $ 110 to $ 1100 minimum wage only to end up negotiating finalmentel by 1 percent: that is ten low dollars!
a pose so unreal can only serve to disarm the fight. For example, you can not deny that certain groups of workers listed with the requirement of such fear and unrealistic increase, thinking that employers prefer to throw them all and close the company ...
The fact is, as usual, the POR is not part of reality. Of course we all want to move from the worst wages in the region to be the first ... But this is not done with speeches and taking the thesis abstract Pulacayo as a talisman to resolve all conflicts, but based on actual power relations and projecting them from the struggle forward. Because if not, what happens is as stated: the pose unrealistic maximalist (which therefore can not convince) is passed without further to accept crumbs: this is because a claim can not be unrealistic parameter and then comes to accept any thing. Inter

: a progressive orientation but with bureaucratic features

We now turn to another aspect of the policy of BY: its policy of fostering inter-union, something not to be traditional organization. The fact is that it was raised last year to regroup the most militant, which as orientation, in principle, no longer correct.
The point is that the heat of the general discontent of the workers were building this project.
But the problem is that the bureaucratically BY finishes typing this positive experience from the teachers' unions city of La Paz and Casegural. That is, the inter-reduced, sectarian, unions that are driven only by the FOR ....
insist, no workers' democracy and no work in the perspective to include other sectors that are in the fight, all this culminates in a large dose of sectarianism.
Because the fact is that the FOR never went looking for other sectors. And it made no real revolutionary politics within these unions or outside them not to go beyond pure pose demands.
The balance which we have been expressed in the sad fact as the basis of teaching (a union that run from head to toe many years ago) comes to accept the paltry 1% increase.
This was one of the pillars of why the general strike could be successful, although of course we blame the usual suspects: the COB, which is but clear that the POR was not able to actually raise a political alternative: "From our point of view, the crisis of the COB is the crisis of leadership, leaders who have passed and now have abandoned the revolutionary politics "(Mass 2202).
course addresses the COB were always trailing the governments. But the problem is that the FOR never had a policy towards these directions. Just kept saying is "because of the way, we can not do anything ".... Avoiding in this way of formulating a policy alternative.
In another of its periodic read as follows "The union bureaucracy is full body naked and reveals that he has never wanted to take you seriously need to struggle to meet basic needs of those who claim to represent" (Mass 2208).
We wonder: it was 1% have negotiated with the government? Because, unfortunately, the POR, along with the COB had the same location in the conflict, only one has a labor union and other care for their own unions. The location of miserable
unionism (not designed as an alternative or lift a list of demands consistent and clear to the government directed MAS) is that you end up accepting this mockery of increase when, clearly, the situation was to go further, raising a different perspective on the direction of the COB and the government of Morales-Linera reform.
What we see is that the FOR has become entrenched in a purely political association despite his "radical" discourse is only in word and ends by confusing their own bases. This occurs when at the height of the class struggle out trading for 10 cents. This BY mates read: "It must become a political and organizational power inserted within social fighters, that lead to the seizure of power. Otherwise, the mobilization may use itself or elevate any vivillos in democratic outputs / bourgeois. "(Mass 2208)
But the reality is that the general strike at no time been "exhausted" and this is another very important discussion with the FOR, so if you shine in the absence of political organization is that they both preach.

Form a political instrument of the workers. We need a new revolutionary socialist organization

The point is that only a revolutionary party from the workers themselves, with workers' democracy, go out to fight politically against the union bureaucracy games we usually traditional parties, may provide an alternative whole.
Only then can form a new class of leaders who can bring together the healthiest of the working class.
For the perspective of revolutionary socialism, and not a mere trade unionism that stagnates over time and policy is that this raised the need to build a new revolutionary socialist organization in the country, part of this perspective, as tactical step to her, could also be the construction of an IPT.

When Hot Flashed Disapear After Ovulation

Spanair: Shuttle Service Form. Collar



In order to expedite the check-in process for your pet when you arrive at the airport, we leave the next link where you can download the necessary form to take your pet by air Spanair which may be carried and completed at home.

this form you can also apply to staff Spanair check-in.

How Soldiers Solved Trench Foot

National Assembly, working, original and popular



























must win the strike and advance the organization

The situation every day more and more power. Problems develop in part by the decided to fix the problems. The government says it "does not touch the reserves that belong to all Bolivians" ... but if you spend in government affairs. Perhaps someone you consulted the purchase of a satellite when working people are starving, the satellite will serve only the wealthy telecommunications entrepreneur is only for the rich to continue doing lucrative business with the workers. In this if the government is spending priorities.
But the government is not only campaigning against workers on the television or radio but lies and dodges status as President Evo Morales was going on a trip to Tarija. Leaving the country to the brink of a national upheaval.
On one hand the President does not deign to discuss the problems and then out to government workers attack with slander. But these activities had been suspended by President mobilizations of workers joining in the national discontent Tarija. The same thing happened on the morning of Thursday 14 in Yacuiba in which workers stand with the president's activities by stopping and demanding agenda to solve the problems.
To succeed in ending the strike is necessary to stop the production base across the country. Intensify locks and control measures in pursuit of getting a pay raise not 15% as stated in the COB but 40%.

The government plays a divide the population

Government policy is to face people. Vice President García Linera and last Friday had urged that the people themselves will put a brake on the march. This had no effect on a point that the social base loses MAS to unprecedented levels. In this sense the government is meeting with leaders of peasants to be shock troops against the workers themselves. This game makes the government can have tragic consequences for the government itself if the blood came to laugh.
also his campaign against the workers of the health funds, blaming their own employees to leave the sick causes discontent grows increasingly. The police repression that makes these movements of workers potentially a more radical departure in government policy. In this play there is no negotiation at all, as more time passes it will become difficult to have an outlet in the framework of the dialogue. What starts to pose a much more radical departure to the facts.

Moving from wage demands

policies again, and the tension in the country, is necessary to discuss more advanced measures, which give workers a tool to overcome the economic crisis the country is living. Has long been discussing the need for a body that can unify and coordinate the struggle, one of these is the inter-experience, but you have to go a step further and this is to ask the National Assembly of Workers.
is necessary to form an organization through the Central Obrera Boliviana than answers and power to carry out the nationalization of the mines, get the multinational oil companies and all private companies, that is what the government never intended to perform. But there will be no support for wage increase if these measures are not performed. What is needed now is to ask the National Assembly that meets all the organisms in the fight and bring together all sectors combative. The National Assembly must have the political orientation and an alternative to this government that turns its back on workers.
This assembly has to be forming an alternative power from the working class to respond to all workers.

National Assembly for a response to workers.

Strengthen measures to fight to win the general strike. Down

21060 and by a true nationalization of oil and mines.

By Martin Camacho

Thank You In A Wedding Program

Rental DiviCom shoots

shooting photos with Rental equipment DiviCom

Bottomless Headscissors

Eduardo Dominguez, "the little teacher '

Eduardo Dominguez is one of the main characters Income pain, frustrated love, Matilde Santos, the teacher who stays true to pedagogical thought he had met in the Republic.
As alluded to those school teachers in my recent book Franco education might have been. Reflections from the desk (Granada, Editorial Zumaya, 2010) Eduardo image was always present. Eduardo
represents what the school officials despised Franco: the teacher who inspired a people-centered education of the student, away from the doctrinaire educational principles of the regime.
When I tried to talk about education at that time in education that could be I did not want to forget the many 'Eduardo' school was in Franco. It would be absurd to pretend injustice criminalize all teachers of that school and included in the educational pattern inspired by the regime.
These are the words with which I have referred to them: "There were probably good teachers who do not share the assumptions imposed on them by the regime, or with the tenets of that school operated as its commitment to education was able to violating the provisions. But unfortunately their membership in that time engulfed them. As a matter of justice, maybe you should ever talk about them and recognize their work. It's more than possible that many of them have felt hurt to include them into disrepute with which generalized the review of that school, often seeking more anecdote than careful analysis and deep, as did much of the literature that proliferated for a while and perhaps epitomized The hanging flower Andrew Soper, although not unique. Not that we advocate a kind of education that most abhor, but I want us to be more fair to those who at that time also opposed the dictatorship from school. "(p. 65).
The little teacher, Eduardo Dominguez, was among them.